WHY BHL&B, P.C.?

Buchholz, Harris, Levine & Brennan, P.C. brings to its practice a rare combination of large-firm skills and savvy, and the personal attention and service that is the hallmark of smaller firms.
 

WHAT HAS YOUR SUCCESS WITH HEALTHCARE CLIENTS LED TO?

Since inception, BHL&B, P.C. has expanded our practice areas to include employment litigation, business consultation, casualty, personal injury and business litigation.
 

WHAT DOES BHL&B, P.C. ATTRIBUTE ITS SUCCESS TO?

Aggressive and imaginative legal defense strategies, combined with responsive, personal, cost-effective service to our clients.
 

WHAT SETS BHL&B, P.C. APART FROM ITS COMPETITORS?

Our attorneys are aggressive problem solvers. They focus on what matters most to you and look for ways to find efficient answers and sound solutions.
1
1

Buchholz, Harris, Levine & Brennan, P.C.

The Law Firm of Buchholz, Harris, Levine & Brennan, P.C. is committed to defending the rights of hospitals, physicians, long term care facilities and other health care providers in claims of alleged medical malpractice, hospital negligence, nursing home negligence, or elder or dependent adult abuse.

The firm’s core area of focus has been to serve and defend healthcare providers, over which BHL&B, P.C. has cultivated its reputation as a leader and innovator in the defense of malpractice claims against hospitals or other health care providers, as well as elder or dependent adult abuse cases. Our successful representation of our healthcare clients has naturally led the firm to expand the scope of its practice to also include defense of employment law claims, casualty, personal injury and general business litigation. READ MORE >

BHL&B, P.C. Expertise

Our years of specialized litigation experience creates an unparalleled expertise in defending our healthcare, individual and corporate clients.

BHL&B, P.C. Latest News

Recent Posts / View All Posts

California Law Update – January 2026

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Fed/State Med Mal Law Conflict) When state’s affidavit-of-merit requirement for medical malpractice actions conflicted with federal rules regulating the same civil procedure, federal rules prevailed. Supreme Court of the United…

California Law Update – December 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Incarcerated Plaintiff) Because courts must ensure that all litigants have their day in court, trial court abused its discretion in not ensuring that incarcerated plaintiff had meaningful access to court.…

California Law Update – October/November 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Evidence) Hearsay testimony from a previous deposition could not be used to raise a triable issue of material fact at the summary judgment stage because it was inadmissible at trial.…

California Law Update – September 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(LPS Act) Employee’s willful disclosure of confidential Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150 record to plaintiff’s relative despite knowing she lacked entitlement required awarding of treble damages under section 5330.…

California Law Update – July/August 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Motion for Summary Judgment) Timely motion for summary judgment must be heard regardless of local court rules or calendaring issues. CFP BDA, LLC v. Superior Court of Riverside County (Peter…

California Law Update – May 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Liability Waiver) Waiver releasing Oakland from liability during charity bike-ride was against public policy to the extent it released the City for negligently violating its statutory duty to maintain public…

California Law Update – April 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Judicial Behavior) Judge’s erroneous and prejudicial evidentiary rulings-coupled with “bizarre,” irrelevant personal musings about society and race-warranted a new trial. Sabrena Odom v. Los Angeles Community College District (No. B327997…

California Law Update – March 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Use of Privileged Communication) Trial court did not abuse its discretion in disqualifying attorney who received a privileged communication from opposing counsel, refused to destroy it, and shared it with…